<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The MuNews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themunews.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themunews.com</link>
	<description>By Blakey Yost Bupp &#38; Rausch, LLP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:51:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>OPEN SPACE MUST BE WITHIN MUNICIPALITY TO COUNT</title>
		<link>http://themunews.com/?p=153</link>
		<comments>http://themunews.com/?p=153#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MU Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Municipal News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themunews.com/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Commonwealth Court recently ruled that open space requirements in a zoning ordinance cannot be satisfied by using open space in an adjoining municipality. Hamilton Hills Group, LLC v. Hamilton Twp Zoning Hearing Board, 2224 C.D. 2009 (Filed 9/1/2010).  In this case, Hamilton Hills Group [“Group”] proposed to build 325 townhouses on land that spanned [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themunews.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=153</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THIRD PARTY A “NO-NO” IN EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR LITIGATION</title>
		<link>http://themunews.com/?p=149</link>
		<comments>http://themunews.com/?p=149#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MU Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Municipal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunshine Act; executive session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themunews.com/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Commonwealth Court has ruled that letting in a third party during an executive session for litigation purposes violates the state Sunshine Act.  Trib Total Media Inc. v. Highlands School District, 1588 CD 2009 (filed August 5, 2010).  In Trib, the school district went into an executive session with a business owner who had filed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themunews.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=149</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES NOT TRUMP ZONING ORDINANCE</title>
		<link>http://themunews.com/?p=145</link>
		<comments>http://themunews.com/?p=145#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MU Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Municipal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comp plan; curative amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themunews.com/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Briar Meadows Development, Inc., v. South Centre Township Board of Supervisors, the developer had an option on two tracts of land and filed a request to rezone the parcels from agricultural to commercial.  The request was denied and Briar Meadows then filed a curative amendment claiming that the current zoning was inconsistent with the Township’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themunews.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=145</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

